South Korea’s Special Forces and the Preservation of Democracy

South Korea’s journey towards democracy is marked by decades of resilience, activism, and critical interventions by various institutions, including its military. In December 2024, South Korea faced a significant democratic test when martial law was declared by President Yoon Suk Yeol, creating a volatile situation. Amidst this political upheaval, the actions of South Korea’s Special Forces, particularly their restraint and alignment with democratic principles, played a pivotal role in safeguarding the nation’s democratic framework.

 Historical Context of Martial Law and Democratic Resilience

South Korea’s history is deeply intertwined with martial law and massive political protests, from the tragic Gwangju Uprising in 1980 to the democracy movement of 1987. These incidents left indelible marks on the national psyche, demonstrating both the perils and potential of military power in political crises. The 2024 declaration of martial law by President Yoon rekindled memories of these tumultuous events, raising fears of violent repression and democratic backsliding.

President Yoon’s actions, driven by internal political strife with the opposition Minjoo Party, aimed to suppress dissent and consolidate power. In effect this was an “autocoup” or “self-coup,” that essentially is an act by an incumbent to retain power against political opposition. However, the swift backlash from democratic institutions, including the National Assembly, underscored the resilience of South Korea’s constitutional framework. The role of the Special Forces in this context was crucial, as their choices carried significant implications for the nation’s democratic future.

 The Role of the Special Forces in 2024

The Special Warfare Command (SWC), a cornerstone of South Korea’s military, was thrust into a precarious position during the martial law crisis. President Yoon’s directives included forcibly removing lawmakers from the National Assembly to prevent a vote on lifting martial law. Yet, Lieutenant General Kwak Jong-keun, the commander of the SWC, made the critical decision to defy these orders, prioritizing constitutional principles over executive commands.

General Kwak’s decision not to use force within the National Assembly building reflected a profound understanding of the military’s role in a democratic society. His refusal to execute President Yoon’s orders was informed by the potential for mass casualties and legal repercussions for soldiers involved. This act of defiance demonstrated the maturity of South Korea’s military leadership and their commitment to their Constitution, ensuring that the legislature could convene and vote to overturn martial law.

 Lessons from the Gwangju Uprising

The restraint shown by the Special Forces in 2024 was informed by the lessons of the Gwangju Uprising, where excessive military force against civilians led to a profound loss of trust in the armed forces. The Gwangju tragedy remains a cautionary tale about the consequences of military overreach in political crises. By contrast, the actions of the SWC in 2024 reflected a deliberate effort to avoid repeating such mistakes, prioritizing the preservation of democratic processes over blind obedience to executive authority.

 The Influence of Civil Society and Veteran Leadership

In addition to military restraint, the involvement of civil society and influential individuals also played a role in mitigating the crisis. Lee Kwan-hoon, a former member of the 707th Special Mission Group, personally engaged with deployed troops, urging them to exercise restraint and respect constitutional norms. His intervention highlighted the importance of moral leadership within the military community, emphasizing the role of individual judgment in upholding democratic values.

Civil society’s response to the martial law declaration further bolstered democratic resilience. Massive public demonstrations, reminiscent of the pro-democracy movements of the 1980s, underscored the people’s unwavering commitment to their hard-earned freedoms. The alignment of military restraint with civilian advocacy created a powerful synergy that ultimately forced the President to rescind martial law and withdraw troops from the National Assembly.

 Broader Implications for Democracy

The events of December 2024 reaffirmed the strength of South Korea’s democratic institutions and the critical role of the military in supporting rather than undermining these structures. The refusal of the Special Forces to act against the legislature ensured that the principle of separation of powers remained intact. This incident serves as a reminder that a professional and principled military is indispensable for the survival of democracy.

Furthermore, South Korea’s handling of the martial law crisis has international implications. As a pivotal global state, South Korea’s commitment to democratic governance influences its partnerships, particularly with the United States and Japan. The restraint shown by the Special Forces prevented the crisis from escalating into a broader geopolitical issue, preserving South Korea’s standing as a reliable partner in the “arsenal of democracy.”

 Lessons for Other Democracies

South Korea’s experience offers valuable lessons for other democracies facing similar challenges. The incident underscores the importance of:

• Strong Democratic Institutions: The resilience of South Korea’s legislature and judiciary in the face of executive overreach was instrumental in resolving the crisis.
• Professional Military Leadership: The judgment and restraint exercised by the Special Forces highlighted the critical role of military professionalism in safeguarding democracy.
• Civic Engagement: The active involvement of civil society and veteran leaders demonstrated the power of collective action in upholding democratic values.

 Conclusion

The actions of South Korea’s Special Forces during the 2024 martial law crisis exemplify how elite military units can play a crucial role in preserving democracy. By choosing to uphold constitutional principles over potentially illegal orders, these forces demonstrated that military power, when guided by democratic values, can be a bulwark against autocratic tendencies.

The crisis ultimately strengthened South Korea’s democratic institutions, proving their resilience in the face of significant challenges. To paraphrase Nietzsche, “That which does not kill democracy makes it stronger.” The Special Forces’ commitment to democratic principles ensured that South Korea emerged from this test with its democracy not just intact but reinforced.

This episode serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of a professional, constitutionally minded military in safeguarding democratic governance. It also highlights the enduring impact of military ethics and training, even beyond active service, as demonstrated by veterans like Lee Kwan-hoon. As South Korea moves forward, the actions of its Special Forces during this crisis will likely be remembered as a defining moment in the nation’s democratic journey.

The post South Korea’s Special Forces and the Preservation of Democracy appeared first on Small Wars Journal by Arizona State University.