Effect of mediolateral leg perturbations on walking balance in people with chronic stroke: A randomized controlled trial

by Alexa A. Krause, Nicholas K. Reimold, Aaron E. Embry, Heather L. Knight, Camden J. Jacobs, Andrea D. Boan, Jesse C. Dean

Many people with chronic stroke (PwCS) exhibit deficits in step width modulation, an important strategy for walking balance. A single exposure to swing leg perturbations can temporarily strengthen this modulation. The objective of this parallel, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial was to investigate whether repeated perturbations cause sustained increases in step modulation (NCT02964039; funded by the VA). 54 PwCS at the Medical University of South Carolina were randomly assigned to one of three intervention groups: Control (n = 18), with minimal forces; Assistive (n = 18), pushing the swing leg toward a mechanically appropriate location; Perturbing (n = 18), pushing the swing leg away from a mechanically appropriate location. All intervention groups included 24 training sessions over 12-weeks with up to 30-minutes of treadmill walking while interfaced with a novel force-field and a 12-week follow-up period, with five interspersed assessment sessions. Our primary outcome measure was paretic step width modulation, the partial correlation between step width and pelvis displacement (ρ_SW). Secondarily, we quantified swing and stance leg contributions to step modulation, clinical assessments of walking balance and confidence, and real-world falls. Outcomes were analyzed for participants who completed all assessment sessions (n = 44). Only the Perturbing group exhibited significant increases in paretic ρ_SW, which were present after 4-weeks of training and sustained through follow-up (t = 2.42–3.17). These changes were due to improved control of paretic swing leg positioning. However, perturbation-induced changes in step modulation were not always significantly greater than those in the Control group, and clinical assessments were similar across intervention groups. Participants in the Perturbing group experienced a lower fall rate than those in the Control group (incidence rate ratio = 0.53), although our small sample size warrants caution. The present results indicate that perturbations can cause sustained modifications of targeted biomechanical characteristics of post-stroke gait, although such changes alone may be insufficient to change more complex clinical assessments.