A question for anti-utilitarians

Many of you know that I have a second blog entitled “TheMoneyIllusion.  Yesterday, I concluded that blog and started a replacement, entitled The Pursuit of Happiness:

URL:  scottsumner.substack.com/

Speaking of happiness, here is a question to consider:

What are the public policies that you oppose even though you believe that they would make the world a happier place in the long run?

I am not interested in unrealistic hypothetical policies involving fanciful creatures such as “utility monsters”; I’m interested in knowing which actual real world policies you oppose despite the fact that you believe those policies would make the world a happier place.

Perhaps you’ll find an example of an actual policy that I should also oppose, which will convince me to abandon my utilitarianism.

PS.  Please don’t tell me that this is the wrong question.  It’s the question that interests me.

PPS.  A Straussian reading of this post is that utilitarianism, properly understood, does not provide clear answers when deciding which public policies are best.  We are like ships navigating in a dense fog.   (The same could be said for Bayesian analysis.)

Here’s a picture of Jeremy Bentham:

 

(0 COMMENTS)